The Annals of Frontier and Exploratory Science
Top-Down and Bottom-Up Hierarchical Processes in the E-Cat
Nuclear Reactor. Physics 2
Vladi S. Travkin,
Hierarchical Scaled Physics and Technologies (HSPT), Rheinbach, Germany,
Denver, CO, USA
Any information displayed here is the propriatary information in the area of
"Top-Down and Bottom-Up Hierarchical Processes in the E-Cat
Nuclear Reactor. Physics 2."
PREFACE
The number of things, the warnings should be said
before even starting to explain - what is going on in the Cold Fusion
(the name that was created while fully coordinated in the deep
bosom of Conventional One-scale
Orthodox Homogeneous Physics (COHP), but now under the attempt
to chitchat this name, the real issue of CF because it was
happened to be reality ) reactor's chamber, for example,
of A.Rossi type?
Among these important things that workers don't discuss
because of ignorence or obvious silent reasons, are:
0) First of all, is that workers that get their living by
sticking to COHP must realize and follow the path - because COHP
in principle denies the COP > 1, while the CF is the COP > 1 (without
the aether, that COHP denies also). Then
anyone should ask - What are doing the researchers with COHP
papers in the CF arena after all events of 1989-90s
about "junk" science of CF?
Unbelievable shameless desire to be on the bandwagon, not left behind, no matter what.
1) What are the chemical elements involved? Do we know their physics,
of Ni, H, Pd, for example? Really with these nuclei?
2) Do we really know that the sub-atomic particles are the point-mass-charge-spin objects
as in COHP they assigned to? Cannot pronounce the name
of these objects "particles," because the point has no physical
meaning as particles have, but mathematical coordinates only [29-33].
3) Do we really know that nuclei of these chemical elements are just
the "fluid" like ball masses? Really know, you mean for sure ?
4) Do really electrons are circling around of these "nuclei"?
Are we just continue to be so stupid that believe that electrons
somehow circling around of nuclei and at the same time:
a) create magnetic moments of themselves and of atoms, and molecules?
b) keep bonding with the neighborhood's atoms, molecules?
c) How they can do this? Can anybody explain with a real dynamics, no mysteries? Starting as - let's say this electron is circling around of this nucleus and at the same time keeping its spin say "Up", so - .....
Oh, it's dissappeared on the other side of this atom - so it can be of any quality ?
5) There is no one correct theory, mechanisms in COHP for connection,
communication, scaleportation of physics and phenomena in CF from a one
separate scale to the another scale physics Bottom-Up or Top-Down.
Homogeneous Molecular Dynamics is inappropriate and even incorrect
for this goal because incorrect are physics and mathematics of dynamics
equations and mathematics is the Homogeneous mathematics - while there
are Heterogeneous media everywhere in the CF reactors.
6) What is the action of EM "fields" when impacting the powder of Ni
(for example) and of Heterogeneous volume mix of powder
Ni and
H
?
By the way - what is the Electromagnetic Field (EM)? Is this the solution
of Maxwell-Heaviside-Lorentz (MHL) set of equations? Any good
corresponding experimental verifications do we know? We know otherwise
about very approximate assessments. And for what media? Homogeneous
media do not exist in CF reactors, but for Heterogeneous media COHP
has no apprehension of the problem, not saying on the solution process.
Do we know the single solution of these MHL equations for Heterogeneous
media of
Ni powder and
H
?
We don't, do you? So, how the EM "fields"
impacting the powder of Ni and
H
in it? What for experimenters do this?
7) What is the chain of elements transformation and why? Not of just
separate one type of kind of transformation with supposedly known energy balance?
8) Who said that the physical and mathematical models that workers
in COHP have been trying to create now for 2-4 years after 2011 for
the CF process' are good or even slightly correct?
The great problem (among others) in this area of physics is inadequate,
obsolete physical and mathematical deduction
(and this brings in the wrong Homogeneous models)
for Heterogeneous media CF processes for either
at atomic-sub-atomic and/or nano/micro scales of media of the
Ni powder filled
with the gaseous components of H and its compounds
plus the catalyst(s) as Li (not the only possible).
And these are the incredible wrongdoings.
Its like the water steam Watt engine being explained with physics of the
before Newton time.
9) Well - it is not surprising that many editors of COHP journals even
don't know and don't understand what is being written in papers,
manuscripts based on the 2nd physics foundation and advancements.
This is above and beyond their apprehension because the lack of proper
2nd physics education in the universities. In spite that the 2nd physics
started in the 1930s with the studies of N.A.Kozyrev [19K-102K].
10) The components of the CF any good theoretical communication should
be recognized as with:
10.1) Understanding that the change of elements in a volume is happening
because the nuclei structures are somehow being re-arranged and
broken (split); and this needs to be explained not with just wordings,
semantics, etc., but with more complicated than the arithmetical equations
of COHNP (Conventional One-scale Homogeneous Nuclear Physics
(COHNP)) theoretical constructions.
10.2) Understanding that there are the Heterogeneous physical processes involved at
any scale in the CF chamber that COH physics cannot work with correctly
anyway. And they should be addressed.
10.3) These polyscale polyphysical phenomena should be explained at any
scale in terms of combined polyscale processes, but not via
separately withdrawn actions.
10.4) One, who is writing about the CF processes needs to have a clear picture,
or say structure models for all elements of transmutations that are taken
place in the reactor. At least, of majority of experimentally detected
products of CF processes - Ni, H, Fe, Cu, etc.
Otherwise, it is just guessing about transmutations like splitting of the
one "liquid" ball nucleus into a few fragments - just conjectural suggestions
without a structural models before and after of CF.
10.5) The intermedium between particles should be recognized as the
medium with its full transport properties including the GE (Governing
Equations), not as just the imagination of quantum vacuum.
10.6) The aether is the best intermedium - and this is known for millenia,
but prohibited in COHP for near 100 years due to special vested interests.
So, all these games with the "entanglement" are the experiments on
collective interaction via the aether, and are known phenomena for at
least near 75 years in spinning ("torsion") physics.
11) So, the "king" of COHNP in these CF phenomena is also nude.
12) The HSP dynamic equations for particles and atoms, and molecules,
and nano- and meso-particles in a chamber with CF processes have a
distant only relationship to the COHP dynamics governing equations.
What a childish model that COHP can present for CF.
13) The physical and mathematical models for processes in the CF
reactor's chamber at meso- and continuum scales are of not less
complexity and of physical questions quality then the sub-atomic,
molecular, and nano- scales models, that need to be resolved.
Fortunately, for these areas in the last ~30 years had been worked out
the much larger number of efforts and studies [1-28] and references thereof.
Many tasks need to be covered with studies and in an effort for
converging some reasonable amount of scales at the sub-atomic,
molecular, mesoscales, and continuum scales physical and mathematical
description of CF processes directed from the Bottom-Up and off the
Top-Down communication.
It's obvious that almost all efforts are performed either in COHP
and/or HSP 2nd physics in each and separate study, projects on a one
separate main scale COHP or 2 and more scales in HS physics and
that's the situation thus far in the field [29-50].
14) All of the above are preliminary warning points
about what to
expect of CF prime "time" initial trustworthy and reasonable
theory and method.
Including and Heterogeneous mathematics and all other
unknown to
editors of COHP journals theories and governing equations.
The following in -
Travkin, V.S.,"Top-Down and Bottom-Up Hierarchical Processes
in the E-Cat Nuclear Reactor. Physics 2,"
(2014)
is the manuscript (large article) open now for the public
that is done in 2012-13 with the intent to embrace in short discourse
the issues mentioned above in this Preface to the text "Top-Down
and Bottom-Up Hierarchical Processes in the E-Cat
Nuclear Reactor. Physics 2."
Top-Down and Bottom-Up Hierarchical Processes in the E-Cat
Nuclear Reactor. Physics 2
Vladi S. Travkin,
Hierarchical Scaled Physics and Technologies (HSPT), Rheinbach, Germany,
Denver, CO, USA
ABSTRACT
The base for explanation of physics for the E-Cat (A.Rossi) Cold Fusion
(CF) reactor processes is formed of the elements of Polyscale
Hierarchical physics that is being in the development itself for
already rather a long time - for more than 45 years. We won't argue
or pursue the fundamentals of Hierarchical Scaled Physics-Volume
Averaging Theory (HSP-VAT is the transitory title) in this material
mostly because it is not a new physics. It is part of the 2nd physics and
known since 1967 for ~50 years.
The problem is that most of conventional
physicists cannot learn, understand and embrace the HSP-VAT. Mostly
because it demands the new physics for Heterogeneous matter and we
know that most of the physical world around of us is Heterogeneous.
The scale accepted and the convenience of the theory and simulation are
the factors of Conventional Orthodox Homogeneous Physics (COHP) that
is the discipline taught at present worldwide in schools and universities.
Meanwhile, the strict physical consideration that is being required in really
challenging or very important areas, fields, problems demands the Hierarchical
Scaled physics as well as the strict mathematical and physical definitions
and tools for that, which mostly are absent in COHP.
They are absent simply because they were missing at the advent of the new
physics of sub-atomic and nuclear phenomena at the beginning of XX.
For example, if the sub-atomic particle/particles are
investigated - then they
should be of particles - volumetric objects, but not the mathematical
point-charge-mass-spins with the properties other than the coordinates
of that point. With the consecutive following appropriate mathematical
procedures that are applied and distributed as the problem's physics.
We are
using advances in the 3P (Polyphase-Polyscale-Polyphysics) theory and
modeling capabilities for the CF processes depiction to develop the script
of processes (physical and mathematical) of collapse or breakdown of Ni nuclei (and
not only Ni element) in Rossi's type of CF reactor (RCFR).
The physical
and mathematical models consisting of 3P particles and the
scale-sub-atomic-to-continua
governing equations create a large set of control equations. This approach
is different from the usual notations in conventional one-scale Homogeneous
chemistry and nuclear physics with the arithmetical equations of chemical
or/and nuclear processes.
One more feature in this work is that the
action-at-a-distance is not allowed without the intermedium as the phase
being present in the volume. For that medium is used the aether. Its
properties have been at serious physical studies for more than a century, at least.
We employ the structured models of Ni, Cu, H, Fe nuclei and atoms in
the vessel of reactor. Structured models of nuclei and electrons, other
known particles all have the EM fields of the lower (sub-atomic) scales,
while their collective interaction controlled by the introduced EM pulsating
fields is the reason and source of collapsing and transmuting of metal elements.
The problem with electrodynamics specifically is that seems nobody;
especially of COHP (Conventional One-scale Orthodox Homogeneous
Physics) specialists is even talking qualified on the electromagnetic
phenomena in RCFR. The examples of COHP electrodynamics in the
reactor are not satisfactory for accepting as an explanation of the
electrodynamics within the RCFR.
The purpose of understanding of
EM phenomena in RCFR is that there is the polyphase polyscale
electrodynamics within the RCF reactor, with the critical role in activation
and for the transmutation and stability of the processes; nevertheless,
COH physics is not familiar with the correct polyscale science due to a
few reasons, known and published reasons. Also, the
Maxwell-Heaviside-Lorentz (MHL) electrodynamics is not suited
and has noted with the insufficiencies for application to
the polyscale polyphase media.
We demonstrate the features of polyscale polyphase electrodynamics
of MHL and Galilean electrodynamics applied to polyscale - from
the sub-atomic to meso-scale continuum mechanics environments in
RCF reactor. This kind of theory gives the ability to model and simulate
the basic polyscale control electromagnetic phenomena within the RCFR.
Meanwhile, that is the fundament for the reactor's function, the nuclei
collapse, break, and transmutation. Not the activities around of
explanation for the temperature, pressure, boiling or not boiling, and phase
mobilities in reactor.
We are delivering here the techniques, some fundamentals of theories,
and methods applied for the two-four-scale description of the sub-atomic
and nano-microsize particle arrays dynamics in electromagnetic fields in
hydrogen medium.
That topic is intriguing in a way that it describes the used physical
mechanisms for field force acting on particles. The much known and
advanced in many sciences force field method, formula by Lorentz has
been shown vividly by Ja.G.Klyushin is experienced with many defects
(insufficiencies) in action. Klyushin developed the new electromagnetic
force field formula between the two point-particles and used to verify it for
many situations.
We applied this advanced EM force field formula for
creation of the governing two-scale dynamic equations for volumetric
charged particles aiming this development first of all for the sub-atomic
particles movement application.
As long as the collapse or break of nuclei give birth to gamma photons
those are still not the heat generating photons - the chain of photon
transformations and nuclear debris collision and interaction leads to
the spectrum of particles and transmutation in this polyphase polyscale
polyphysics environment.
The following in:
Travkin, V.S.,"Top-Down and Bottom-Up Hierarchical Processes
in the E-Cat Nuclear Reactor. Physics 2,"
(2014)
is the manuscript (large article) that is done with the
intent to embrace in short discourse the issues mentioned
above in the Preface to this text "Top-Down and Bottom-Up
Hierarchical Processes in the E-Cat Nuclear Reactor. Physics 2."
Acknowledgements :
We would like to sincerely express our acknowledgment
to T.J.Champion for the support in providing this work.
References:
1. Whitaker, S., Simultaneous Heat, Mass
and Momentum Transfer in Porous Media: a Theory of Drying,
in Advances in Heat Transfer, Vol. 13,
Academic Press, New York, pp. 119-203, (1977)
2. Whitaker, S.,
The Method of Volume Averaging,
Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, (1998)
3. Slattery, J.C.,
Momentum, Energy and Mass Transfer in Continua,
Malabar, Krieger, (1980)
4. Quintard, M., Whitaker, S.,
"One and Two-Equation Models for Transient Diffusion
Processes in Two-Phase Systems," in
Advances in Heat Transfer, Vol. 23, New York,
Academic Press, pp. 369-465, (1993)
5. Kaviany, M., Principles of Heat Transfer in
Porous Media, 2-nd Ed., Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, (1995)
6. Travkin, V.S., Catton, I., Transport Phenomena
in Heterogeneous Media Based on Volume Averaging Theory, in
Advances in Heat Transfer, Vol. 34, New York, Academic Press,
pp. 1-144, (2001)
7. Gray, W.G., Lee, P.C.Y., "On the Theorems for Local Volume Averaging of Multiphase Systems," Int. J. Multiphase Flow, Vol. 3, pp. 333-340, (1977)
8. Gray, W.G., Leijnse, A., Kolar, R.L., Blain, C.A., Mathematical Tools for Changing Spatial Scales in the Analysis of Physical Systems, Boca Raton, CRC Press, (1993)
9. Travkin, V.S., Continuum Mechanics of Heterogeneous
(Ht) Media; Elasticity, Plasticity,
(2005)
10. Travkin, V.S., Catton, I., "Porous Media Transport
Descriptions - Non-Local, Linear and Nonlinear Against
Effective Thermal/Fluid Properties," in Advances in Colloid
and Interface Science, Vol. 76-77, pp. 389-443, (1998)
11. Travkin, V.S., "Why is it Different from Homogeneous and other Theories and Methods of Heterogeneous Media Mechanics/(other Sciences) Description?"
(2002)
12. Travkin, V.S., "Are there any other Methods and Theories available?"
(2002)
13. Travkin, V.S., "Pseudo-Averaging (Scaling, Hierarchy), Quasi-Averaging, Ad-hoc Averaging, and other "Averaging" (Scaling, Hierarchy) Type Claims,"
(2003)
14. Travkin, V.S., "Experiments, Experimental Data Reduction and Analysis; Numerical Experiment (Simulation) Data Mining,"
(2004)
15. Travkin, V.S., "Reductionism and/versus Holism in Physics and Biology - are Both Defective Concepts without Scaleportation,"
(2004)
16. Travkin, V.S., "Classical Problems in Fluid Mechanics,"
(2003)
17. Travkin, V.S., "Solid State Plasma Models,"
(2006)
18. Travkin, V.S., Nanotechnologies - General Concept for Pretty Large Amount of Pretty Small Gadgets Embedded Into Something and Consequences for Design and Manufacturing,
(2006)
19. Carbonell, R.G., Whitaker, S., Heat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media, in Fundamentals of Transport Phenomena in Porous Media, J. Bear, M.Y.Corapcioglu, eds., Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp. 123-198, (1984)
20. Travkin, V.S., Ponomarenko, A. T., "The Non-local
Formulation of Electrostatic Problems for Sensors Heterogeneous
Two- or Three Phase Media, the Two-Scale Solutions and
Measurement Applications -1,"
J. Alternative Energy and Ecology, No. 3. pp. 7-17, (2005)
21. Kheifets, L.I., Neimark, A.V., Multiphase Processes in Porous Media, Moscow, Nadra, (1982) (in Russian).
22. Travkin, V.S. and Bolotina, N.N., "Pseudo-Scaled and
Scaled Description and Scaleportation of Inorganic and Organic
Polymer and Polymer Composites Properties," Journal of Alternative
Energy and Ecology, No. 1, pp. 62-77, (2011)
23. Travkin, V.S., Acoustics,
(2004)
24. Travkin, V.S., Electrodynamics,
(2005)
25. Travkin, V.S., Heterogeneous Scaled Biophysics (HtScBp). Fundamentals,
(2007)
26. Travkin, V.S., Thermal Physics,
(2002)
27. Travkin, V.S., "Thermal Physics. Classical Problems,"
(2003)
28. Travkin, V.S., Fluid Mechanics,
(2002)
29. Travkin, V.S.,"Torsion" or Spinning (Rotation)
Physics Scaled (SPS),
(2013-2014)
30. Travkin, V.S., "What Classical Mechanics of XVIII
Provided in XX Has Done Wrong to the Base of Mechanical Science
Including the Classical Mechanics of Continuum Particles and Conventional
Orthodox Homogeneous Particle Physics",
(2014)
31. Travkin, V.S.,"The Major Forces Have Been Missing
From Governing Equations for Dynamics of Sub-atomic and
Continuum Particles, Bodies in XVIII - XX ",
(2014)
32. Travkin, V.S., "Scaled Presentation of "Torsion" Mechanics in Polyphase Media,"
(2014)
33. Travkin, V.S. and Bolotina, N.N., "The Classical and Sub-Atomic
Physics are the Same Physics,"
,
(2013)
34. Travkin, V.S., What's Wrong with the Pseudo-Averaging Used in
Textbooks on Atomic Physics and Electrodynamics for Maxwell-Heaviside-Lorentz
Electromagnetism Equations,
(2009)
35. Travkin, V.S., Incompatibility of Maxwell-Lorentz Electrodynamics
Equations at Atomic and Continuum Scales,
(2009)
36. Travkin, V.S., Electrodynamics 2 -
Elements 3P (Polyphase-Polyscale-Polyphysics),
(2013)
37. Travkin, V.S., Particle Physics - Heterogeneous
Polyscale Collectively Interactive,
(2011)
38. Travkin, V.S., Particle Physics (Particle
Physics 2). Fundamentals,
(2013)
39. Travkin, V.S., Nuclear Physics Structured.
Introduction,
(2006-2013)
40. Travkin, V.S., Cold Fusion or LENR is the HSP-VAT Science,
(2009)
41. Travkin, V.S., "Two- and Three-Scale Polyphase (Local (Sub--Atomic) - Nonlocal) Galilean Electric and Magnetic Fields in a Solid and Nano-powdered Cu and Ni (Copper and Nickel),"
(2013)
42. Travkin, V.S., "Gamma Photons in Rossi's E-Cat Nuclear Reactor and Real Heating Particles and Effects,"
(2013)
43. Travkin, V.S., "Hierarchical Scaled (HS) Particle Physics in Rossi's E-Cat Nuclear Reactor,"
(2013)
44. Travkin, V.S., Statistical Mechanics Homogeneous for Point Particles. What Objects it Articulates?
(2014)
45. Travkin, V.S., Solid State Polyscale Physics. Fundamentals,
(2014)
46. Travkin, V.S., "Structure and Types of Hydrogen and Oxygen Atoms and Their Heavy Isotopes,"
(2014)
47. Travkin, V.S. and Bolotina, N.N., "Hydrogen in HSP-VAT. Introduction,"
(2013)
48. Travkin, V.S. and Bolotina, N.N., "Water Structured. Introduction,"
(2013)
49. Travkin, V.S. and Bolotina, N.N., "Two scale Modeling of Water Molecule Atoms and Overall Water Mesoscale EM Galilean Fields ,"
(2013)
50. Travkin, V.S., "3P Water, Heavy Water Molecules, Deuterium, Tritium Collective Interaction-1,"
(2014)
Special Publications of Kozyrev, N.A.
19K. Kozyrev, N., "Note on the Structure of Sunspots,"
Circulars Ch. Astronomical Observatory at Pulkovo, #2, pp. 3-5, (1932)
23K. Kozyrev, N., "Note on the Depth of Sunspots," Circulars Ch.
Astronomical Observatory at Pulkovo, #6, pp. 3-9, (1933)
24K. Kozyrev, N., " Spectrophotometry," in "The Course of
Astrophysics and Stellar Astronomy," Part 1: Methods of Astrophysical Research and Astrophotographic Investigations, Ed. B.P.Gerasimovitch, Ch. 4, pp. 266-314, (1934)
25K. Kozyrev, N., "Radiative Equilibrium of the Extended Photosphere,"
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astron. Society, V. 94, No. 5,
pp. 430-443, (1934)
27K. Eropkin, D.I.,Kozyrev, N.A., "Spectrophotometry of the Night
Sky and Zodiacal Light," Circulars Ch. Astronomical Observatory at
Pulkovo, #13, pp. 21-25, (1935)
28K. Kozyrev, N.A., "Sources of Stellar Energy and the Theory of
the Internal Structure of Stars," News Krymsk. Astrophysical
Observatory, Vol. 2, pp. 3-43, (1948)
31K. Kozyrev, N.A., "The Internal Structure of Stars on the Basis
of Observational Data," Bulletin of Leningrad Univ., Vol. II, pp. 32-35, (1948)
35K. Kozyrev, N.A., "The Theory of the Internal Structure of Stars
and Sources of Stellar Energy," News Krymsk. Astrophysical Observatory,
Vol. 6, pp. 54-83, (1951)
36K. Kozyrev, N.A., "The Internal Structure of the Major Planets,"
Dokl. USSR Academy of Sciences, Vol. 79, No. 2, pp 217-220, (1951)
46K. Kozyrev, N.A., Causal or Asymmetrical Mechanics in Linear
Approximation, Pulkovo, (1958) 90 p.
49K. Kozyrev, N.A., "Volcanic Activity on the Moon," Nature, Vol. 3,
pp. 84-87, (1959) (in Russian)
52K. Kozyrev, N.A., "Observation of a Volcanic Process on the Moon,
Sky and Telescope, Vol. 18, N. 4. P. 184-186, (1959)
60K. Kozyrev, N.A., "Spectroscopic Proofs for Existence of Volcanic
Processes on the Moon ," in The Moon, Proceedings of the Symposium N 14 of The International Astronomical Union held at Pulkovo Observatory near Leningrad, December 1960. L., N.Y., pp. 263-271, (1962)
89K. Kozyrev, N.A., "East-West Asymmetry of Saturn's Ring,"
Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 111-116, (1974)
94K. Kozyrev, N.A., Nasonov, V.V., "On some Properties of Time
Discovered by Astronomical Observations," in Manifestation of Cosmic
Factors on the Earth and the Stars, M.; L., pp. 76-84, (Problems Investig. Universe, Vol. 9), (1980)
99K. Kozyrev, N.A., "About the Impact of Time on the Substance,"
in Physical Aspects of Modern Astronomy, L., pp. 82-91, (Problems Investig.
Universe, Vol. 11), (1985)
102K. Kozyrev, N.A., Selected Works, Leningrad, LGU, (1991). 445 c.
This is also the well known
problem - still can not be resolved within the Homogeneous One-Scale
General physics, Spinning physics, nuclear, particle and atomic physics,
electromagnetism, and gravidynamics.
UNDER CONTINUAL DEVELOPMENT
