The Annals of Frontier and Exploratory Science

up to

INTRODUCTION

The hydrogen element and its physical features topic is thoroughly deliberated in Conventional Orthodox Homogeneous Physics (COHP) for at least many decades, especially since 1920s when the need for serious research was obvious in atomic physics.

Since 1920s there was developed a huge amount of COHP explained physics of hydrogen and data related to hydrogen physics itself and use, interaction of hydrogen with a great amount of substances and in technologies.

Meanwhile, the silently kept features are just hidden from even observation, let alone the study.

We won't and cannot describe the great amount of knowledge regarding the hydrogen physics when hydrogen and its physical interactions in various technologies are revealed via the scaled hierarchical vision. That is the hydrogen that has the simplest atom and the simplest molecule, but shown in COPH as the solar system reminding structure (planetary) when the imaginable electron(s) is circling around of "indefinite structure" nucleus of spherical shape, when unification of atoms in hydrogen molecule is explained via the same circling imaginary fantasy. While the magnetic and electric properties and features of atoms and H molecules are explained with the highly artificial and approximate mathematical tools of QM, QFT, etc.

We would start with the theory of structured hydrogen atom, electron, proton, nucleus, molecule mostly following the developments by Ph.M. Kanarev in particle and atomic physics those we have found as the most advanced at this time in physics. Then we proceed to physics of electron arrays based on the HSP-VAT methods for Maxwell-Heaviside-Lorentz and Galilean electrodynamics, H molecule arrays (gas) dynamics (not the molecular dynamics (MD) of homogeneous physics) when we accept the ideas and vision of the nature of one and many electrons and molecules in the determined volume. Those issues are different than in COHP explained hydrogen physics phenomena, while the hierarchical scaled approach allows contemplating the known phenomena at present at each scale of considered physics, homogeneous and/or heterogeneous.

For example, if in scaled physics the electron arrays should be and can be undoubtedly considered as the number of electrons as of the sub-atomic particles, not a cloud of mathematical mass-points, in the aether, in the medium, not in the vacuum that has, nevertheless, the electrodynamics properties? If a medium is empty - means nothing inside of a volume, it should not have any properties by the logical and philosophical definitions.

Key figures for understanding the change of perception of sub-atomic particles:

Then, we concerned to the never considered problem (well, it was considered either simplistically or bluntly incorrect regarding the mathematics and physics statement), of what are the properties of such an array if it is moving in space (aether) while particles (electrons, protons) explicitly have dynamics or due to initial impulse or due to external electromagnetic fields (while this definition of electromagnetic field needs to be specified additionally to get to more strictly and openly stated meanings) - we will enumerate a number of simplifications taken in COHP for that kind of problems for accelerators, when even the governing equations are written incorrectly, with unrecognizable simplifications.

The hydrogen gas properties can be shown have obvious and straightforward definitions and models for their simulation, while we need shortly to address the existing homogeneous theories (homogeneous by nature of accepted methods for gaseous medium as being homogeneous in COHP for actual heterogeneous polyphase (at least three phases - gaseous molecules, CMBR and an aether) problems of gaseous media in a volume).

We guess, that the COHP education won't allow to point out - What's wrong with this picture? Wrong not in terms of COH chemistry - that is OK, but the molecules are not the balls or similar structures. What a change. We are talking about the polyscale chemistry.

Besides, the methods of COH physics do not allow to model and simulate this gas in a vessel. The COHP MD can not treat this gas, with these molecules.

Regarding the hydrogen bonding that plays so great role in explanation of multiple, huge amount of chemical, biological, and technological phenomena with the explanation of the bonding as in the following figures (from internet, and remember that here is the educational web resource):

The second, there is no such a "hydrogen bond" kind as is depicted in this and millions of similar drawings of water molecule and hydrogen bonding in substancies.

Then we should fully reconsider the educational curriculums and in chemistry as well. Poor students.

Additional note: to understand the approach and methods of HS (hierarchical scaled) physics at atomic and sub-atomic scales used in this chapter (section) readers need to go through some of the already known and published for more than 45 years the ideas, definitions, methods developed and explored in this physics, that is the covering of COHP, such as those mostly relevant to the particle physics and atomic physics.

The strict arguments in a favor of naturally appealing physical disciplines are spelled in our - "Electrodynamics 2":

Hydrogen in HSP-VAT **

Access to manuscript may be obtained for qualified parties. Apply for authorization.

================================================================================

Almost any information displayed here is the proprietary information in the area of "Hydrogen in HS Physics".

This is also the well known problem - still can not be solved within the Homogeneous One-Scale particle physics, atomic physics, chemistry theories.

UNDER CONTINUAL DEVELOPMENT