The Annals of Exploratory Science
Vladi S. Travkin
Hierarchical Scaled Physics and Technologies (HSPT), Rheinbach, Germany, Denver, CO, USA
ABSTRACT
Embryonic Induction (EI) people studying for more than a century and there are not much of understanding, progress in theories, and cannot be from our point of view. All previous efforts were based and controlled by the Conventional One-scale Homogeneous Physics (COHP) that itself has the great flaws - especially at the small scales.
This is not a chemical, biophysical, electromagnetic, or any conveniently known type of interaction.
Among a number of ideas for EI process we will follow the ideas and qualitative description of EI mechanisms by A.V.Bobrov the creator and pioneer of discovery the experimental physical ground for the Phenomenon of Biological (Embryonic) Induction [1-6].
We developed the quantitative physical and mathematical mechanisms that are involved onto the phenomena of experimentally found EI that based on the same experimental findings and Hierarchical Scaled Physics (HSP) as the part of Physics 2 [7-58].
The studies of macromolecule/regulator(s) in EI by their pair-by-pair (because the aim is the collective interaction in Conventional One-scale Homogeneous Biology, Biophysics (COHB)) influence and interaction in Embryonic Induction biologysts, embryologists do for more than a century.
First of all this will not advance us a lot because the studies involving a separate few macromolecules from acting of thousands others collectively - are just separate steps in the Sisyphus labor, the second is that this is in principal won't open the gates to understanding of EI - and mostly because the key is laying in the another box, or better to say - in the other universe.
The influense, decisive mechanisms of EI are so the grand task to describe by humans so far - that it is out of our ability to do this strictly step-by-step as in general science the humanity accustomed to understand and perform already for five hundred years.
Because it is first of all - that there is unknown mechanism of Transduction of a control for a similar or copy macromolecules, aggregates, and their collective function just in the differentiation path not of a one kind of genes, macromolecules, but of a different organ's part.
This is not a chemical, biophysical, electromagnetic, or any known conveniently type of interaction.
Nevertheless, biological, embryological communities forcing governments Up to now spend billions of dollars on the specifics of actually only the one path - the chemical one. When imaginable or suggested a few macromolecules as the transported, diffused into another cells - and that is the essence of the story!?
Meanwhile, the core of the EI process ascribed in COHB is even not a physical one. The problem as usual is that physics (means even COHP and COH chemistry) in these biological, embryological studies is not present. We cannot name the kind of description of EI in the following (just examples for education) pictures otherwise as the plain wrong
Fig. 1 Figures illustrating the process of Embryonic Induction in the scientific and educational literature (from internet, educational samples)
These pathways are mythical simply because the "signaling" information re-structuring flux cannot be placed within these schemes - too much of information and programming "codes" for the macromolecule arrays! And this is not the only reason for denunciation of the simplest EI pathways - as via just chemical, macromolecules transport. Too simplistic and a good reason for further funds.
As soon as the experiments confirmed the event of EI and its results - the problem is still in the theoretical explanation and possible methods for controlling the process with a modification scenario.
Of course we are not interested in picking up the one by one any macromolecule/regulator(s) and ascribe what they accomodate/perform during demonstration of their ability to do the differentiation path-work.
At the same time we do explore the experimental data as the source of theoretical physical explanation and can not use the many theories of COH physics as of the science that found in many fields as the compromised and insufficient with the definitions and tools within even the established parts of physics [13-16,18-31,35-36,45-50].
At the beginning we would like to remind about some foundations for Hierarchical Scaled Physics, the part of Physics 2, that are in the development since the 1980s.
To remind here in text all the related sections, parts, concepts, etc. we will refer to the publications that are mostly open for public and can be found in this website and also published elsewhere. We can do this only as of the partial excerpts and with reference to the full publications.
The aether phase importance with the subject texts (not complete and full) exposed to some extent in [17,19-29,35-40,45].
For the strictness of exposition of known and coherently explained and modeled within the paradigm of simultaneous Polyscale-Polyphase-Polyphysics (3P) physical entities and modeling them as a set of related concepts, 3P theories has been suggested as the needed concept along of intermediate medium - an aether. The long range interaction can not be provided, executed via the real emptiness, real nothing instead of the ather.
The other forms of intermedium as used in COHP the "quantum vacuum" and "physical vacuum" are not satisfactorily defined, equipped with properties of physical medium - so, they can not be accepted as the intermedia for polyphase sub-atomic scales physics.
It is known for centuries that physicists always considered the presence of some intermediate substance and called it an aether.
There is the need to stress out that at the beginning of XX century there was no understanding and no physics and mathematics of polyphase, Heterogeneous physical subjects. Physicists couldn't even approach to that kind of problems. The understanding of needs for Heterogeneous media physics had appeared later at the time of WWII for the tasks related to atomic and nuclear weaponry and nuclear power.
The fundamental issue of acceptance of aether existence immediately stands the question that physicists of XX century couldn't approach and solve: Any medium with aether recognized is being meant having at least of the two "phase" medium - one is the aether itself and another is what is put in the problem at the beginning of any study - at least one medium for even a homogeneous medium.
But the two-phase and polyphase media physics and mathematical methods for them did not exist at the first half of XX century. This is not taught in the universities and students don't know about this.
There are many other experimental data with the rotating bodies that have been unexplained within the traditional university-organized and funded by governments physics.
We just do not have to deal with the reviews on Spinning physics that cannot be explained with COHP (Conventional One-scale-Orthodox Homogeneous Physics) - it is done in many other HSP publications [17,31,35-40,] along with other sciences publications.
And they are all talking about the inadequacy of university physics and physics of rotation, spinning, including and sub-atomic particles.
------------------------
Meanwhile, COHP itself cannot make a proper theory - it has internal deep fundamental contradictions within itself. This is the problem. Nothing is more important in physics.
----------------------
What's Wrong in Physics? [14-31,35-36]
The biggest problem (among many others) was created by COH physics itself when agreed, probably by every one of particle physics creators to consider the sub-atomic particles as the dots without a size and a surface, meaning that the point-mass-charge-spin is the thought after sub-atomic particle. We have discussed on this and explained - What a mess and blockage for future advancements has being done with this simplification for the sub-atomic particles, instead of relief, in our -
There are many other plain imbalances in COHP - we spoke on this and analyzed in various publications - mostly in the internet as soon as general scientific mass media, COHP mass media, blocking this kind of publications and keeping a low profile about great problems in physics. Only small part of publications on HSP, Physics 2 and on very selected topics usually reaching the general pools of professionals and public [8,10,48-49,54-56,58].
We should understand and remember that the whole body of the orthodox physics stands on the statement that - the averaging, even sometimes the collective interaction can be provided, achieved everywhere where in need, can be and has been provided within this the one scale physics. While that is not true, yeah, unfortunately this is a pure uneducated lie.
Now - in COHP workers have the "inhibition of apprehension" regarding the
phenomena of "Torsion" mechanics, physics.
It is just the terra incognita for COHP.
The Great Unknown largely area of physics has being missed by COHP - unbelievable
disqualification of COHP itself.
One of the reasons for invisibility-like of "Torsion" physics is the missing
of aether, the denunciation of the aether in COHP. By using the words as
"physical vacuum" is not enough
to recognize the facts of appearance and disappearance of sub-atomic particles
in the invisible aether, the word that designates to some extent
the unknown
and not-understood features of the aether.
Principles of the Theory of Particle Physics [12-13,19-20,30-36,39-40,43-46]
1) Recognition of the fact - that at any scale the physical substance, particulate media in a volume of interests when the number of particles is substantial and one of the interests is the properties of the physical medium (as of a volume), but not of only the one single particle which is still the inseparable component of the problem (issues of physical interest), is the Polyphase (at least two phases, one is the interparticle medium that can include the aether) Polyscale (at least two scale) Heterogeneous (Ht) medium. At atomic scale, sub-atomic, or at some of the continuum scales. ....
4) Recognition or knowledge of the fact - that for studying the polyphase matters, media the only correct way is to use the discovered in 60s - 80s methods, theorems of Hierarchical physics and mathematics: Hierarchical Scaled Physics - Volume Averaging Theory (HSP-VAT), those specifically were created and tuned throughout the last 40+ years for polyphase polyscale physical, biological matters.
One of the examples, is the use of Gauss-Ostrogradsky (GO) theorem for deduction of governing equations for near 200 years in physics and other sciences. This theorem is valid only for a Homogeneous matter, that most of professionals even do not know and acknowledge. In hierarchical mathematics there are many like theorems for the same purposes that have been developed and used during the last 40 something years. ....
Hierarchical Polyphase Polyscale Concepts for Heterogeneous Media of Particle Physics and for their Modeling [17-19,39]
1) There is no physical phenomena, process, act that at the determined scale is not of the Volumetric character or is not consciously or sub-consciously understood and/or modeled with the Averaged phenomena of the sub-scale. Any point-like experiment or method, theory is about for accepting at first the premise that the point is formed by/after somehow averaging of the forces/movements/reactions etc. of the below scale physics. Mostly it is done implicitly, even sub-conscious, but this premise is ALWAYS present. The Top-Down sequence of physical phenomena is more accurate down to the sub-atomic scale particles, an aether in between the particles and some pertained to them phenomena.
What regards to the down scales from an Electron approximate dimension and structure that is covered at our times with the dense fog of the current state particle physics because at the beginning of XX they started from the strong postulate - that electron is the point-mass, period, and so they did not need to consider even smaller "particles" (we don't know whether they are particles at all, or just new kind of objects that hardly can be named "particles"? Anyway - down the scale we can not rely on the conclusions of high power accelerators research - and first of all - because they all are based on the MHL electrodynamics. As we know, it is full of insufficiencies.) That is why in conventional particle physics are so many "color" and other non-physical definitions (just appropriate mathematics) for the sub-atomic particles. ....
Hierarchical Polyphase Polyscale Concepts for Heterogeneous Media of Spinning Particles and Spinning Physics and for their Modeling [17-19,39]
1) The Spinning Fields of Aether (SFA) are the aether's phenomena. Meaning, that any SFA is the component, one of the components of the aether that has an immediate interaction with the Spinning fields of the particles.
2) The Spinning Fields of MO (Material Objects) are the whole group of related phenomena, such as: a) The velocity fields of the surface and interior of the sub-atomic particles (SaP); b) The fields of EM phenomena within the sub-atomic particles; c) The structure fields - 3D spatial fields ascribing the sub-atomic particles array in its spatial 3D formation including its volumetric and surficial characteristics; d) The fields of gravidynamics of the spinning particles.
3) The sources of the Spinning Fields are the properties of classical spin of the sub-atomic particles or macroscopic particles rotation (spinning), but not the torsion of the points that "like" imitates the dynamics of volumetric bodies of the particles. How is it happening with the details of physics and with the governing equations only the HSP methods allow to state and model, but neither PVT (Shipov) nor other Homogeneous, One Phase, One Scale theories are capable to explain and deliver this. ....
27) It is our privilege to say that any experimental study in Spinning Physics provided for the last ~50 years are the studies on polyphase effects of aether regarding the collective interaction of subatomic and larger rotating particles (bodies) and any of these experiments can be analyzed only with the application of HSP techniques, for example, as noted on some of these in - Experimental Science in Heterogeneous Media
The difference in the HSP theory and mathematical implementation for
Spinning ("torsion") physics is so large that
principal physical and mathematical models, modeling and simulation are
qualitatively different in comparison to Homogeneous one scale governing
equations and statements in COHP. It is not that the one, two terms or coefficients
are different,
it comes to different kinds of governing equations with additional physical
phenomena that are not seen in the COHP statements.
That is why the direct comparison is only partially possible
[14-16,19-21] while physics is different whatsoever.
These are exactly the issues that show and explain the qualitative
differences between Spinning ("torsion") physics theories
proposed in the COHP and HSP.
So far no other theory in physics being able to follow the details of physical nature for Spinning Physics experiments and respond with the credible explanation and models of local and nonlocal character. ....
What are the Features of Physics 2 and Why most of COHP Physicists going Dumn or Mad When Realize What it is? [37,40]
Some of Physics 2 features [37,40] are rather difficult to read and apprehend for making the COH physics consistent for professionals, for example: ....
4) Recognition, knowledge, and use of the facts that the sub-atomic particles are not the Point-Mass-Charge-Spin (PMCS) objects, but the Volumetric Structural Objects-Particles with the mass, charge, and spin as established by experiment.
5) Recognition and acting in the studies with the aether as not of a simple Homogeneous or even Structural, Corpuscular or similar Heterogeneous structure volume filling (between the atoms and sub-atomic particles) substance, matter.
The aether is much more complicated matter with mostly by experiments revealed properties up to the present - beginning of the XXI. One of these properties is the Materialization - Dematerialization (Transduction in and out) of a matter and use in our universe, world.
6) Recognition, knowledge, and use of the Heterogeneous mathematics based at present mostly on the Heterogeneous theorems that are similar to Homogeneous mathematics theorem of Gauss-Ostrogradsky.
....
12) The speeds of interaction, influence and the field transport signs speed in the aether are much larger then the speed of light in the aether. The Entanglement is just the feature of transport in the aether. So, no SR and GR, and not only because of speed, but mostly because of improper theory in MHL electrodynamics, Homogeneity of Spatial Matters, and of the Aether absence. No just geometrization of physics as the wacky offer, point of view.
13) There are others then the four kinds of interaction that are accepted in COHP at present. And the 3rd and 4th "interactions" of COHP with high possibility are just of the electromagnetic nature.
....
Classical Experiments of XIX-XX Wrong Homogeneous One-Scale Interpretation in COHP [22,40]
.... All these re-interpreted [40,22] crucial for physics and technologies experiments - Fizeau experiment, A.A.Michelson and E.W.Morley experiments, Stern-Gerlach and Davisson-Germer experiments - all of them - or more correct is to say - that their incorrect (MHL incorrect formulations in the still aether and in a substance, Homogeneous One-scale media accepted in experiments) interpretations (especially of Michelson and Morley experiment of 1987, and silencing of D.Miller, D.Miller and E.Morley, and A.Michelson and E.Morley experiments in XX) established for more than a century the incorrect theoretical interpretations of the world's physical phenomena [59,14-16,18-21,30,35-38,etc.].
Because all these wrong idealistic XVIII style interpretations and theories brought in the "relativity" ideas, relativity principles in electrodynamics by H.Poincare and H.Lorentz (Lorentz and of others transformations) that they in turn relied on just mathematical imbalances in the MHL modified Homogeneous One-scale electrodynamics [59,60-62,18-21,30,35-38,53,58].
That already not Maxwell's electrodynamics later on was reformulated by A.Einstein (and his co-authors), M.Planck, D.Hilbert, and F.Lindemann into the SR and GR with all these errors of MHL electrodynamics for Homogeneous media, Homogeneous and One-scale media of Universe in SR, GR with the added notions of torsion and curvature [17,38-40] into again the Homogeneous World space media. That was also the need to drop the aether as the intermedium from the SR and use only the Point-Mass-Charge-Spin (PMCS) "particles" for the interactions.
The great majority of Spinning Physics Scaled (SPS) professionals do not realize, because of their education and set up of COH physical knowledge, that the spining particles cannot rotate - not twist (we are not talking on the spin here, note this) being at the same time hung in the "nothing" of "quantum" vacuum or "physical" vacuum. Those two last "vacuums" are not fully defined as the media in COHP.
As long as the formulation of physics of Spinning Fields of MO in COHP is not credible - there are no torsions, twisting, curvature, no Homogeneous governing equations etc. [17,39-40], that stops reasonable scientific discussion about the difference in the spin-torsion interactions and it interaction's "constant"(?) between HSP and COHP. Nothing really physical is to discuss on this matter, read our [17,35-40]. The fundamentals of space, mathematics of Heterogeneity, forces in and around of spinning particles, electrodynamics of spinning particles, collective interaction, etc., etc. are absent or wrong in Homogeneous One-scale "torsion" physics [17,38-39].
The fact is that the determination of these so-called "constants" is actually a cheating on professional public as long as the phenomena of averaging in Heterogeneous media are not known to COHP part of physics.
Of course, the best way to suggest and then to state with a certainty, that some phenomena exist is to propose at the same time the probable mechanism for that phenomena. Here Bobrov proposed the phenomenon of "information interaction" that is semantically correct, but anyway is not supported immediately by any physical mechanism for its existence.
There is no "information interaction" in strict terms in physics, it does not exist. There is no "Information Field" in strict terms, at least in this context and unphysical meaning, as for the "torsion" physics. This definition exists in qualitative terms in many sciences, but this does not make it to exist in physics unless we introduce some strict mechanism for its determination and actions, and then create the possible definition of "field" for it.
We have been suggesting the physical definitions for "Information Fields" and related things.
Thus, on the other side - if to use the determined physical terms as spinning (rotation) velocity, 3D space, movement, dynamics, a matter of presence in the volume, aether as a medium, and aether's components (also suggected by many researchers), interaction of aether with the spinning Material Object (MO), dynamics of particular and "continuum" matters in the volume, suggestion for the aether as being the elastic, visco-elastic, or viscous medium with, at least, of the two components "phases" (we don't go Downscale on aether's matter in this theory so far), etc., etc., then one can certainly state that the physical components, fields of existing spinning phenomena are Do exist in this matter.
Regarding the Phantoms appearance in SPS experiments in our physical world are the result of Partial Restoration, Materialization of the part of former material subjects in form of particles in this material world from the copy in the aether after the OSF MO provided the interaction (Spinning particles - aether's immediate "phase" and the "copy" phase) and they are the physical objects.
They are not just imaginable images - Ghosts in brains of experimenters; they are the real images that are being recorded by physical equipment of experimenters.
Even conceivable images in any Visual Technology (VT) are the things that have strict physical base for appearance. These images are created on visual device screens because of the presence of sub-atomic and atomic size particles (name atoms also the particles of special properties - which is true actually) in the experimental natural observation (environment in experiment), then in the Visual Technology screen - so they are PHYSICAL objects, but not imaginable Ghosts.
They have been created as some part(s) (traces) of inexistent at given time and space objects in Our Universe World (OUW) -- but during their visualization from the copy in the aether's "phase" they are being made the real physical objects at least at the time of recording and in the images which are the physical objects.
This should include the Reciprocal (MO-Aether-MO (MAM)) Transduction and Backward Materialization (RTBM) of the sub-atomic particles and atoms, molecules.
They had the physical base in the past time - that explains the appearance of their OSF in the past and a copy of in in the aether. And that OSF had stored in the aether's some sub-phase structures up to the time when they due to some unclear at present (but not for any case - for example, some specific electromagnetic impacts can retrieve phantoms) physical impacts.
The mechanism(s) of water activation with impact of Spinning Fields is of the similar kind of the Reciprocal (MO-Aether-MO (MAM)) Transduction and Backward Materialization (RTBM) of the sub-atomic particles and atoms, molecules.
The physical mechanism of RTBM is uncertain and still under investigation in spite of multiple evidences, exclusively via experimentations that the water properties and structure somehow are changeable during and many days after this induced impact.
What is suggested by Bobrov regarding this mechanism execution with the involvement of "torsion fields" of a Physical Vacuum that itself even not a medium, cannot be taken as proven and trusted as long as we have explained the inapplicability of this conjecture in [17,38-40].
Meanwhile, the one fact of this phenomenon of water activation with Spinning fields is the evidence - it is the maintaining of water in some state of increased "structurezation" even after providing destruction procedures to the bulk of water.
By this effect - that can be and is named as the memorizing of previous water structure conditions, this can be maintained by the "exchange," or "uploading" or "materialization" or "phantom restoration" or "phantom transduction" from the certain "memory" "phase" of the aether.
By this fact -- we have supported the vision for aether as the "polyphase" medium with one more reason for this. Because this "memory" phase of the aether can not be sustained within the same one phase of the selected medium without consecutive mixing, "diffusion" as such (as we understand this now with the process of mixing).
Actually it is the same or close to the mechanism of Phantom transduction from the aether.
Meanwhile, we need to remind to readers that the term "water structure" is just the verbal qualitative term in COHP without the attachment to it of the physical and mathematical features, models that should be specific with their strictness.
Up to now it is done only within the methods of HS physics [63-71] where the word - Structure, means really morphopological Heterogeneity, not a simple Inhomogeneity. Is this clear for students?
Given by A.V.Bobrov the picture of the first part of RTBM generally is the correct qualitative picture of transduction of the "matrix element" ("donor" substance) OSF with help of the LED emitter OSF, while we have in HSP the physical and mathematical (with mathematical governing equations) models for the transduction of the "matrix element composition" spinning-fields to the addressed OSF of an aimed biological object.
There are at least two issues that should be thoroughly studied:
1) How the OSF of LED emitter pick up the OSF of the original "matrix element"?
How they interact and fuse? With the Physical and Mathematical Models.
2) How the combined "fused" OSFs transduct the impact to the target in biological object or just another "material" ("reciever" substance) ?
With the Physical and Mathematical Models. We need to refer to [39] for physical (7-11) Concepts for Heterogeneous Media of Spinning Particles and Spinning Physics and for their Modeling.
Spin of the separate sub-atomic particle is the physical
field of Angular Momentum at the Lower scale presentation with the dimension
of
[kg m
/s].
Meanwhile, in and for the specifics of Spinning Physics Scaled (SPS) we are looking for the role and models not only of the spins of rotating sub-atomic particles, but and of many other physical fields involved in the phenomena and on different scales.
The mathematical procedures in which this Upper scale field (Upper Scale Spinning Field - USSF-OSF) is usually obtained had been performed in various physical sciences in HSP already [8,10-11,32,34,45,48-49,51-52,58,etc.] and had proven of its credibility up to the exact solutions for, at least, the 2-scale phenomena. The physics of Lower and Upper scale Spin Fields can be characterized and modeled only in HSP because COH physics has no physical and mathematical mechanisms to ascribe the Own Spinning Field (OSF).
The OSF of the piece of the matter or a number of particles, atoms, molecules within the specific localized volume of the 3D space
"is the averaged spatially the same local fields of this or
that physical nature - of OSF
,
OSF
,
....OSF
The subscript number means the array of specific sub-atomic particles, for
example, array of electrons will be designated as OSF
with its volume
,
photons array as OSF
with its volume
,
protons array as OSF
with its volume
,
neutrons array as OSF
with its volume
.
" [39].
Given above by A.V.Bobrov the qualitative description of the OSF does not contain within this description any Quantitative characteristics, features that are strongly physically and mathematically express sufficient enough qualities to connect the verbal qualitative description to the known now the knowledge base of physics and mathematics [17,7-12,35-40]. Including and Hierarchical Mathematics.
And it is not surprising - as we said in many publications the non-physical "torsion" theories of COH physics ~(1970s - 2010) are good enough only for printing on paper or in the internet, but did not and cannot communicate the theoretical constructs to the experimental findings and to the rest of physics [17,38-40] that seems is not disputed in our times - not all of COHP.
These "torsion" COHP theories did not allow to model, mathematically with connection to particle, nuclear, atomic and Continuum Mechanics (many sciences) any feature of incredible experimental results [1-6,17,22] in Spinning ("torsion") physics .
"Torsion" fields of physical vacuum is the fiction; fictitious physical objects and fields without characterization of their relation to the aether -- as the only and total volume occupying medium of interaction; that itself consists of the various "phases."
In the concept of А.Е. Akimov on the "torsion" field is nothing said -- and nothing could be said neither by Shipov nor Akimov about -- How this "torsion" field for a specific particle or an array of particles is being created based on the fields of sub-atomic particles spinning? The one, two particles to the billions of them in the aether? To the Continuum body?
With the direct physical and mathematical model - not with the irrelevant SR, GR and such kind of equations.
This cannot be answered not only in "Torsion" physics, but in the entire COH physics, we wrote on this numerous manuscripts, papers [7-46].
There is no interaction between the singular phenomenon, particle dynamics and of their Collective Dynamics in COHP. No theories, unrelated mathematics, no toolls. Only the HSP-VAT (part of the Physics 2) has developing those.
There is no "Torsion" Field - again [17,38-45]. It is the polyphysics (many sciences involving) arguments. There is the "polyphase" aether - supported in experiments and different scale OSFs in Material Objects (MO) and in the aether as well correspondingly.
We suggesting -- that the OSF of the MO or volume with MO
makes at least the direct dynamical interaction with the "phase
"
of the aether and at the same time makes via the another "phase
"
the copy of the current OSF of the MO -- the "phantom" of this MO in the
aether.
Regarding the experiments by A.Bobrov with the transport of physical properties from one substance to the another one - seeds, water, etc. [1-6], we also need to include into physical picture all the interacting "phases" of interacting matters and physical mehanisms of impact onto them.
Acquiring the properties ("information") of the "information matrix" (AB) -- that is the first (donor ) substance for the transfer of combined properties of the Spinning radiation and of the donor substance, of course, can be formulated in terms of Continuum Mechanics sciences established mechanisms (formulation of the dependences between the different physical properties in the substance) of interaction between the functions (properties) within the given volume of the substance. Altogether with the assigned or preferred Boundary Conditions.
Meanwhile, as long as we considering the sub-atomic mostly scales with their constituents as the properties and physics (mostly dynamics so far) of the sub-atomic spinning particles -- it will be natural and more correct to use the sub-atomic physics tools, theories for the description of the transport of existing and Acquired properties in the "donor" and "receiver" substances.
That means -- in this path we might experience and formulate the transported properties of the substances in the aether - a) generator of the SF(s) (irradiator) within the knowledge base at the moment; b) "donor" substance; c) "receiver" (target) substance -- instead of the general unphysical definitions as of the words -- information and information matrix.
All 3 substances have their OSFs.
The phenomenon of "Phantom's Transport" -- transport of properties of the "donor" substance to the "receiver" (target) substance is the confirmation of the different "phases" existence within the aether. Because it is much more cumbersome to imagine the impact of direct irradiation of the "receiver" (target) substance with the (OSFs-ASFs (AetherSFs)) and the same time and volume -- the resurrection of properties of the "donor" substance due to the irradiation with the "wind" of OSFs of (OSFs-ASFs)?
The resurrection in this case meaning the "appearance" of the "donor" substance particles, molecules in the volume with the "receiver" (target) substance and interaction with it or staying within it? Due to the irradiation?
Meanwhile, it is much more feasible (pleasable) to realize the combined interaction of the irradiation of (OSFs-ASFs) together with the phantom's in the aether impact on the "receiver" material.
Due to phantom's in the aether presence (his presence has no locality terms -- its presence localized by aether's "ability" (again thousands time confirmed in experiments by researchers in Spinning (" torsion") physics, medical professionals as doctors on homeopathy, Psychic readers, amateurs with Psychic talents) to "find" an analogy in needs from the phantoms "phase" limitless "memory") with the phantoms "phase" and the triggering of the incoming to the "receiver" the irradiation of (OSFs-ASFs).
We suggesting -- that the OSF of the MO or volume with MO makes at least the direct dynamical interaction with the "phaseint" of the aether and at the same time makes via the another "phasecop" the copy of the current OSF of the MO -- the phantom of this .
In all three substances these OSFs can be described and have physical and mathematical formulation and models with the aether as the main factor of the Transduction of the properties [17,35-36,38-40].
This is hardly to be accepted the pure model of the "convection" "diffusion" like mixing of the OSFs of the two first substances -- because in this way the mixing of OSFs would entail the indistinguishable consequences for the "receiver substance -- when there will be no way to make the definitive impact on the "receiver" material as it is shown in the experiments.
Meanwhile, it is known that the experiments established the clear ability of impact onto the receiver with the exact chemistry of the "donor" substance.
Meaning the exact copies of the "donor" substance chemical molecules or their phantoms acting in the "receiver" substance.
Following this deliberation we can hypothesize:
b) If to accept the reality of some materialization of chemical molecules of the "donor" substance within the volume with the "receiver" (and acting as the usual chemicals of the "donor") due to impact of phantom transported in the aether from the "donor's" volume -- then we should recognize the Two-way transduction of Material Object from the Our Universe World (OUW) to the aether (one of its "phases") and from the aether (partially) back to the Our Universe World.
c) Nevertheless, the reality of both mechanisms of "donor's" chemicals Transduction from the "donor's" volume to the "receiver's" volume is still the option. For example, the Kirlian effect is the Two-way transduction of Material Object from the Our Universe World (OUW) to the aether and from the aether (partially) to the Our Universe World. This experimental fact is the one that even came into practice along with the other SPS experimental findings.
It is important to re-state here with regard of Bobrov's experiments that they are all the subject of the strict mathematically correct statements of polyscale, polyphase problems in Spinning ("torsion") physics and the explanation of the experimental results as delivered in Hierarchical Scaled Physics [7-58,63-71].
In the abstract of [1] one can read - "Abstract
--- In the first part justified the existence of the second field information factor - Own Spinning Fields (OSF) of material objects (MO), actively participating in processes of field of information exchange. The main characteristics and properties of OSF MO considered. Induction Phenomenon - is a manifestation on micro-level the phenomenon of Field information interaction OSF MO. For example, the participation of OSF MO in the phenomenon of induction shows the functional significance of the second field factor."
Our Comments:
In the first part of this significant paper one can find the description on the qualitative level of the great biological phenomenon of Embryonic Induction (EI).
(Embryonic (Biological-HSPT)) Induction was discovered by H. Spemann in 1901. ....
.... However, the nature of the phenomenon and its mechanisms over the next ~110 years remained unknown. The physical nature determination for the phenomenon of Embryonic Induction was possible only after the discovery of the phenomenon of Information interaction of SCF MO. It has been shown that this phenomenon, and the phenomenon of Embryonic (Biological)) Induction --- are one and the same phenomenon that is occurring on the macro- and the cellular and molecular levels [1-6].
The main question of the phenomenon from the scientific point of view is still the issue - What is the mechanism with its physical and mathematical model for the OSF interaction in biology of the EI ?
How in terms of physical process and mathematical model this process of Embryonic Induction or OSF interaction happens?
Does it happen just with using the Aetheromechanics governing equations (our material world similar to the Continuum Heterogeneous Mechanics governing equations -- plus Hierarchical Electrodynamics in Polyphase media of interacting MO)?
Probably not as simple, as logics and modeling tell us.
Which supposed that by using the Our Universe World (OUW) with Our Civilization Science (OCS) system with the systems of equations suitable for the case (as we developed in SPS, for example) with the consecutive simulation of the mathematical model we can find some Quantitative relationship between the given OSF1 (first, primary, principal MO1 in the EI phenomenon) and the newly protruded (transported) from a some "distant," for example, second MO2 location that became the close location OSF2 of this second MO2 to the MO1? Accept that before these actions - nowhere and nothing of close location OSF2 MO2 is known or existed, but only the primary MO1 and its OSF1s.
The said above in no way means the complete, whole ability of biophysics at this time and knowledge to reproduce or claim the full capability to know the whole process in detail for any physical process occurring.
This action can be done and modeled in the following (MOW1 - Modeling in Our World) procedure with the use at first of the 7-11 Concepts from [39] and the HSP mechanisms, interpretations and models in section 2 of this manuscript:
1) Both OSF have their respected sets of Governing Equations (GE1 and GE2) if we want to establish and study the mathematical models for the process of interaction of two OSFs.
2) Because this is the transient problem - then the first (primary) OSF for MO1 mathematical modeling should be performed until the quasi-stationary conditions in the problem will be achieved.
This should include and the Reciprocal (MO-Aether-MO (MAM)) Transduction and Backward Materialization (RTBM) of the sub-atomic particles and atoms, molecules. No way to avoid this path of modeling!
For this part of modeling should be improved the physics and mathematics of the theory regarding the sub-atomic particles Reciprocal (MO-Aether-MO (MAM)) Transduction!
3) Then, the second set of GE2 will be brought into the outlined position close to the first MO1 and GE1 of its position in the space. This can be done in a number of algorithms.
4) The simulation of the second set of GE2 solution will start with the known quasi-stationary solution for the first GE1 set. Also with the Reciprocal (MO-Aether-MO (MAM)) Transduction and Backward Materialization of the sub-atomic particles and atoms, molecules.
5) The Transformation, Transmutation, and Transduction of the sub-atomic particles, nuclei, and atoms will be achieved in the Reciprocal (MO-Aether-MO (MAM)) Transduction and Backward Materialization modeling of both MOs transient existence.
6) We (humanity) are aware at present of the ways to achieve the direct massive controlled Transmutation of elements possibly even without (MO-Aether-MO (MAM)) Reciprocal Transduction (?) - examples include the biological controlled Transmutation of elements by species and the Cold Fusion processes, so far only these well known and documented paths for low temperature elements Transmutation.
Then the another path can be suggested for this EI process.
II) Or this can be explained only with the primary inclusion of the Partial Restoration, Reciprocal (MO-Aether-MO (MAM)) Transduction, Backward Materialization (RTBM) of some material parts (as sub-atomic particles, nuclei, atoms, molecules, clusters of water (for example), macromolecules, nanoparticles, micro-particles, etc.) of a Newly Brought in MO (NBMO) that used in the Embryonic Induction procedures to incorporate them into the tissue or part's tissue, organ which will be reformatted (differentiated, changed in its natural pathways at the particular place and moment) in an embryo?
This action can be done in the following algorithm (MAW1 - Modeling in the Aether World) steps:
1) First of all, the first 4 steps from the MOW1 will be available and achievable.
5) Still, the emphasis is done with the aether's side transductions - not actually visible for us so far, transport and transformation of the sub-atomic particles.
6) The exchange of Our World particles from the MO1 for the MAW1 particles of the MO2 will go well inside of the aether - which probably is the case.
Then the Partial Restoration of the MO2 particles (Backward Materialization (RTBM)) from the aether side to the area occupied by MO1 performs the tasks of exchange of old particles MO1 with the newly brought in on the same(?) MO1 places particles of the MO2.
7) This Physics 2 algorithm is suggested on the base that:
We cannot imagine (no traces of this) just the kinds of chemical, nuclear, or particle exchange within the MO1 by the MO2 particles and newly differentiated molecules, atoms.
When the "path" of Embryonic Induction via the convective transport(?) of macromolecules and fictitious "signal(?) transduction pathways" from the "nearby cells" - is regarded in COH biology as the possible primary explanation of EI that means the level of biological research is not changing throughout the century. Again, it's not surprising when counting on the COH physics level development through the same century.
Fig. 2 Figure of the schematic Transduction of the Spinning fields throughout the two media onto the biological test agent (dry yeast)
Comparing to the electromagnetic fields transport (distribution) - Fig. 3, through the polyphase medium one can notice the similarities and the difference between both transporting systems. While the ideology and mathematical approaches are analogous then the nature of physical fields, scales, and the governing equations are rather quite different [14-16,31-32,54-55,58,63-68].
Fig. 3 Microscale electromagnetic Continuum Mechanics flux transport through the polyscale-polyphase system of a substance
"Specificity studies of spin fields macro-objects related to the need for their involvement descriptions, while those are not discrete values of the physical magnitude quantities characterizing a given material object and other, but of qualitative - structural and topological indicators."
Our Comments:
Exactly the need for structure and geometry and physics should be taken in as the combined interactions of aether's Own Spinning Fields which is the Incarnation of the supplemental aether's sub-level that is related to the interaction with the spinning surface of the sub-atomic particles!
"A. The physical nature of the phenomenon of (Information-HSPT) Induction discovery of the phenomenon of Information interaction Own spin fields of material objects at the macro level led to the definition of the physical nature of the phenomenon of (Biological) Induction and its mechanisms. "
Our Comments:
The nature of Embryonic Induction (EI) up to the details of theoretical advances and mathematical models is not fully disclosed to researchers. Nevertheless, many questions can be unswered along at present.
What can be suggested regarding physical and mathematical interpretation of the Embryonic Induction experiments and Bobrov's explanation of EI is given at the beginning of section 3 of the current paper on Physics 2 (HSP) interpretation of the EI phenomenon.
"From the above examples it follows that the specificity of different manifestations of the phenomenon of induction required to describe them to attract the quality --- structural and topological indices. of known physical fields to satisfy the above conditions are in the fields of spin --- nature's own spin fields of material objects [5] and the torsion field of physical vacuum --- torsion fields"
Our Comments:
Here we don't support the identity of mathematical torsion fields of PVT (Shipov) and existing in nature at the aether related scales the fields that "transimprint" to the near spatial locations the properties of "original" volume with the substance for "transimprinting."
"Consideration of the indicators in Table III leads to the conclusion that the phenomena of Embryonic induction, and Information Interaction of Own Spinning Fields (OSF) of material objects --- are one and the same phenomenon observed in different epochs over the distinct objects using different methods"
Conclusions
We brought in this manuscript the most conclusive arguments at present that should make more visible and clear the foundation for the fantastic findings of experimental Spinning Physics Scaled (SPS) [1-6,17,38-40, etc.]. Among these data are the models for explanation of properties for the aether along with the SPS experiments HSP (Physics 2) interpretation. Demonstration of illogical explanation of experimental SPS data with the Homogeneous tools of COHP has ascribed and laid out the foundation of physical mechanism (Physics 2) for both ways (to the aether - from the aether) Transduction of material properties during the Embryonic Induction phenomenon ((process).
1. Bobrov, A.V., "The Interaction of Spin Fields - Fifth Fundamental Interactions. Pt.1," Int. Journal of Unconventional Science, Vol. 1, No.1, pp. 48-57, (2013)
2. Bobrov, A.V., "The Interaction of Spin Fields - Fifth Fundamental Interactions. Pt.2," Int.Journal of Unconventional Science, Vol. 1, No.2, pp. 8-22, (2013)
3. Bobrov, A.V., "Spin Fields of Material Objects - Information Second Factor in the Field of Information Interactions Phenomenon," personal communication, pp. 1-53, (2015)
4. Bobrov, A.V., "The Phenomenon of Information Interaction Own Spin Fields of Material Objects, Pt. 1," Consciousness and Physical Reality, Vol. 15, No.7, pp. 14--27, (2010)
5. Bobrov, A.V., "The Phenomenon of Information Interaction Own Spin Fields of Material Objects, Pt. 2," Consciousness and Physical Reality, Vol. 15, No.8, pp. 48--63, (2010)
6. Bobrov, A.V., "The Physical Nature of the Phenomenon of Biological Induction," Consciousness and Physical Reality, Vol. 16, No.11, pp. 40--63, (2011)
7. Travkin, V.S., Fundamentals of Hierarchical Scaled Physics (HSP-VAT). Description of Transport and Phenomena in Heterogeneous and Scaled Media http://travkin-hspt.com/fundament/index.htm. (2003)
8. Travkin, V.S., and Catton, I., Transport Phenomena in Heterogeneous Media Based on Volume Averaging Theory, in Advances in Heat Transfer, Vol. 34, Academic Press, New York, pp. 1-144, (2001)
9. Travkin, V.S., Continuum Mechanics of Heterogeneous (Ht) Media; Elasticity, Plasticity, http://travkin-hspt.com/elastic/index.htm, (2005)
10. Travkin, V.S. and Catton, I., "Porous Media Transport Descriptions - Non-Local, Linear and Nonlinear Against Effective Thermal/Fluid Properties," in Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, Vol. 76-77, pp. 389-443, (1998)
11. Travkin, V.S., "Why is it Different from Homogeneous and other Theories and Methods of Heterogeneous Media Mechanics/(other Sciences) Description?" http://travkin-hspt.com/fundament/03.htm, (2002)
12. Travkin, V.S., "Reductionism and/versus Holism in Physics and Biology - are Both Defective Concepts without Scaleportation," http://travkin-hspt.com/fundament/scaleport/scaleport.htm, (2004)
13. Travkin, V.S., "Solid State Plasma Models," http://travkin-hspt.com/atom/01.htm, (2006)
14. Travkin, V.S., What's Wrong with the Pseudo-Averaging Used in Textbooks on Atomic Physics and Electrodynamics for Maxwell-Heaviside-Lorentz Electromagnetism Equations, http://travkin-hspt.com/eldyn/maxdown/maxdown.htm, (2009)
15. Travkin, V.S., Incompatibility of Maxwell-Lorentz Electrodynamics Equations at Atomic and Continuum Scales, http://travkin-hspt.com/eldyn/incompat/incompat.htm, (2009)
16. Travkin, V.S., Electrodynamics 2 - Elements 3P (Polyphase-Polyscale-Polyphysics), http://travkin-hspt.com/eldyn2/index.htm, (2013)
17. Travkin, V.S., "Torsion" or Spinning (Rotation) Physics Scaled (SPS), http://travkin-hspt.com/rottors/right.htm. (2003-2014)
18. Travkin, V.S. and Bolotina, N.N., "The Classical and Sub-Atomic Physics are the Same Physics," http://travkin-hspt.com/parphys/pdf/51_PrAtEd-QM-Ref-2HSPT.pdf, (2013)
19. Travkin, V.S., Particle Physics - Heterogeneous Polyscale Collectively Interactive, http://travkin-hspt.com/parphys/index.htm, (2011)
20. Travkin, V.S., Particle Physics (Particle Physics 2). Fundamentals, http://travkin-hspt.com/parphys2/index.htm, (2013)
21. Travkin, V.S., Nuclear Physics Structured. Introduction, http://travkin-hspt.com/nuc/index.htm, (2006-2013)
22. Travkin, V.S., Experimental Science in Heterogeneous Media, http://travkin-hspt.com/exscience/index.htm, (2005)
23. Travkin, V.S., Statistical Mechanics Homogeneous for Point Particles. What Objects it Articulates? http://travkin-hspt.com/statmech/index.htm, (2014)
24. Travkin, V.S., Solid State Polyscale Physics. Fundamentals, http://travkin-hspt.com/solphys/index.htm, (2014)
25. Travkin, V.S., "Two-Scale Three-Phase Regular and Irregular Shape Charged Particles (Electrons, Photons) Movement in MHL Electromagnetic Fields in a Vacuum0 (Aether)," http://travkin-hspt.com/parphys2/abstracts/twoparticlesshort-ab.htm, (2013)
26. Travkin, V.S. and Bolotina, N.N.,"Two-Scale Two-Phase Formation of Charged 3D Continuum Particles - Sphere and Cube From Electrons in a Vacuum0 (Aether). An Example of Scaleportation of Charge from the Sub-Atomic to Continuum Charged Particles, Conventional MD Cannot be Applied," http://travkin-hspt.com/parphys2/abstracts/subtocontin-ab.htm, (2013)
27. Travkin, V.S. and Bolotina, N.N., "One Structured Electron in an Aether (Vacuum0) Electrodynamics, Many Electrons in an Aether Fixed in Space - the Upper Scale Galilean Electrodynamics ," http://travkin-hspt.com/parphys/abstracts/stillelectrons-ab.htm (2011)
28. Travkin, V.S. and Bolotina, N.N., "Electrons and CMBR (Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation) Flux of Photons in a Vacuum0 (Aether) - Two-Scale Galilean Theory ," http://travkin-hspt.com/parphys/abstracts/elcmbr-ab.htm (2010)
29. Travkin, V.S., "Top-Down and Bottom-Up Hierarchical Processes in the E-Cat Nuclear Reactor. Physics 2 ," http://travkin-hspt.com/coldlenr/ecathier1/ecathier1-ab.htm, (2012-2013)
30. Travkin, V.S.,Atomic and Subatomic Physics 2 - Elements 3P, http://travkin-hspt.com/atom2/index.htm, (2003-2015)
31. Travkin, V.S., "Classical Mechanics Attempts for Description of Atomic Physics (ClM One-scale One-phase Homogeneous Atomic Physics - ClMO2HAP) Phenomena ," http://travkin-hspt.com/parphys2/clmechonesc1/clmechonesc1.htm, (2014)
32. Gordienko, Y.G. and Travkin, V.S., "Transport Properties of Point-Like Objects in Multi-Scale Heterogeneous Substructure," http://travkin-hspt.com/atom/pointlike.htm, (2003)
33. Travkin, V.S., "Crystalline Medium Defects and Micro-Heterogeneous Solid State Plasma VAT Equations," http://travkin-hspt.com/atom/04.htm, (2004)
34. Travkin, V.S., "Bridging Atomic and Macroscopic Scales for Materials, Process, and Device Design. US-Russian Workshop on Software Development (SWN2003)," http://travkin-hspt.com/atom/SWN2003.htm, (2003)
35. Travkin, V.S., "What Classical Mechanics of XVIII Provided in XX Has Done Wrong to the Base of Mechanical Science Including the Classical Mechanics of Continuum Particles and Conventional Orthodox Homogeneous Particle Physics", http://travkin-hspt.com/rottors/classmechwrong/classmechwrong.htm, (2014)
36. Travkin, V.S., "The Major Forces Have Been Missing From Governing Equations for Dynamics of Sub-atomic and Continuum Particles, Bodies in XVIII - XX," http://travkin-hspt.com/rottors/forcemissing/forcemissing.htm, (2014)
37. Travkin, V.S., Elements of the 2nd Physics at the beginning of XXI , Elements of the 2nd Physics at the beginning of XXI , (1978-2015)
38. Travkin, V.S., "Concepts for SHSP: HSP Conceptual Vision and Methods in Application to Spinning (Rotation) Heterogeneous Scaled Physics (SHSP)", http://travkin-hspt.com/rottors/concepts/concepts.htm, (2014)
39. Travkin, V.S., "Scaled Presentation of "Torsion" Mechanics in Polyphase Media", http://travkin-hspt.com/rottors/tormechpoly/tormechpoly.htm, (2014)
40. Travkin, V.S., "Spinning or "Torsion" Mechanics in "Homogeneous" Media? Is it Possible?" http://travkin-hspt.com/rottors/torsmechhom/torsmechhom2.htm, (2015)
41. Travkin, V.S., "Pseudo-Averaging (Scaling, Hierarchy), Quasi-Averaging, Ad-hoc Averaging, and other "Averaging" (Scaling, Hierarchy) Type Claims," http://travkin-hspt.com/fundament/pseudo.htm, (2003)
42. Travkin, V.S., "FAQ - or Freelance Discussion on the Topics of HSP-VAT Education," http://travkin-hspt.com/fundament/discussion.htm, (2004)
43. Travkin, V.S., "The Local, Non-Local, and Scaled Metrics, Physical Fields, and Their Mathematical Formulation," http://travkin-hspt.com/fundament/scalingmetrics.htm, (2003)
44. Travkin, V.S., "Comparing with Governing Equations and "Averaging" in Homogenization Theory," http://travkin-hspt.com/fundament/homo/homog.htm, (2004)
45. Travkin, V.S., "Are there any other Methods and Theories available?" http://travkin-hspt.com/fundament/04.htm, (2004)
46. Travkin, V.S. and Bolotina, N.N., "How not to Scale-Down...or -Up.. ..Analysis of Current Studies on Scaled, Collective Phenomena in Biology Fields Presented as the One-Scale Concepts," http://travkin-hspt.com/bio/biopapersop.htm, (2008)
47. Travkin, V.S., "Analysis of Current Studies on Scaled, Collective Phenomena in Medicine Fields Presented as the One-Scale Concepts," http://travkin-hspt.com/med/medpapers/medpapers.htm, (2010)
48. Travkin, V.S., Fluid Mechanics , http://www.travkin-hspt.com/fluid/index.htm, (2002-2015)
49. Travkin, V.S., Thermal Physics , http://www.travkin-hspt.com/thermph/index.htm, (2002-2015)
50. Travkin, V.S.,"Homogeneous Mathematical Schemes for Heterogeneous Multiphase Fluids - 14 Years After 1998 Analysis and Criticism, " http://travkin-hspt.com/fluid/homofluids2012/homofluids2012.htm, (2012)
51. Travkin V.S., Classical Problems in Fluid Mechanics, http://travkin-hspt.com/fluid/03.htm, (2003)
52. Travkin V.S., Classical Problems in Thermal Physics, http://travkin-hspt.com/thermph/02.htm, (2003)
53. Travkin V.S., Education, Courses, http://travkin-hspt.com/edu/index.htm, (2003)
54. Travkin, V.S. and Bolotina, N.N., "Quantum Chemistry, Physical Chemistry, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, DFT (Density Functional Theory), and Coarse-Graining Techniques Applied in Structural, Cellular Biology, Polymer Science and Implication for Scaleportation," Journal of Alternative Energy and Ecology, No. 2, pp. 58-75, (2011a)
55. Travkin V.S. and Bolotina N.N., "Pseudo-scaled and Scaled Description and Scaleportation of Inorganic and Organic Polymer and Polymer Composites Properties," IS Journal of Alternative Energy and Ecology, No.1, pp.62-77, (2011).
56. Travkin V.S., Bolotina N.N., and Gusev A.L., "Presentation of Continuum Mechanics Elasticity Models for Heterogeneous Media. The Polyphase and Polydefect Scale Physics, Hierarchical Mathematics Applied," IS Journal of Alternative Energy and Ecology, No.2, pp.19-41, (2012)
57. Travkin V.S. and Bolotina N.N., "Principles, Biological and Mathematical Modeling for Elasticity, Poroelasticity of Soft Biomedia, Polymers with Fluids Mechanics in the Bioporous Two-scale Media," http://travkin-hspt.com/biophysics/pdf/61BEl-BioHtElasticity-5.1HSPT-f.pdf, (2011)
58. Travkin, V. S. and Ponomarenko, A. T., "Electrodynamic Equations for Heterogeneous Media and Structures on the Length Scales of Their Constituents", Inorganic Materials, Vol. 40, Suppl. 2, pp. S128 - S144, (2004).
59. Sull', S.A., The Origins and Misconceptions in Relativism. Looking Through the Century, http://lib100.com/book/other/collection_s/_ The Origins and Misconceptions in Relativism. Looking Through the Century , (2006) (in Russian)
The Origins and Misconceptions in Relativism. Looking Through the Century
60. Klyushin, J. G., Some Fundamental Problems of Electro - and Gravidynamics, St. Petersburg, RF, (2007)
61. Klyushin, J. G., Electricity, Gravity, Heat - Another View, St. Petersburg, RF, (2012)
62. Santilli, R.M., Ethical Probe of Einstein's Followers in the USA: An Insider's View, "http://www.scientificethics.org/IlGrandeGrido.htm," (1984)
63. Travkin, V.S. and Bolotina, N.N., "Hydrogen in HS Physics Structured. Introduction," http://travkin-hspt.com/parphys2/abstracts/hydrogen-ab.htm, (2012)
64. Travkin, V.S., "Structure and Types of Hydrogen and Oxygen Atoms and their Heavy Isotopes," http://travkin-hspt.com/parphys2/hydrooxyatoms/hydrooxyatoms.htm, (2013)
65. Travkin, V.S. and Bolotina, N.N., "Water Structured. Introduction," http://travkin-hspt.com/parphys2/abstracts/water-ab.htm, (2012)
66. Travkin, V.S. and Bolotina, N.N., "Two scale Modeling of Water Molecule Atoms and Overall Water Mesoscale EM Galilean Fields ," http://travkin-hspt.com/parphys2/abstracts/water2scale-ab.htm, (2012)
67. Travkin, V.S. and Bolotina, N.N., "Water Magnetization - What is it in the Real Polyscale Physics? ," http://travkin-hspt.com/parphys2/abstracts/watermag-ab.htm, (2012)
68. Travkin, V.S., "3P Water, Heavy Water Molecules, Deuterium, Tritium Collective Interaction," http://travkin-hspt.com/parphys2/watmolsinter/watmolsinter.htm, (2014)
69. Travkin, V.S., "Water Clusters and Induced Water Clustering - Scaled Forces **," http://travkin-hspt.com/parphys2/waterclust/waterclust.htm, (2014)
70. Travkin, V.S., "Live Water HS Molecules After "Torsion" Fields Impact. What Have Been Changed? On the Sub-atomic, Atomic and Continuum Mechanics Scales? **" http://travkin-hspt.com/rottors/livewater/livewater.htm, (2014)
71. Travkin, V.S., "Water Treatment with Spinning Fields **," http://travkin-hspt.com/rottors2/waterspintr1/waterspintr1.htm, (2014)
*********************************************************************************
Any information displayed here is the proprietary information in the area of "Embryonic Induction is the Spinning and Aether Physics Based and Explained Phenomenon."
This is also the well known problem - still can not be resolved within the Homogeneous One-Scale General physics, Spinning physics, nuclear, particle and atomic physics, electromagnetism, Gravidynamics and astrophysics.
